CPD frameworks
These frameworks, associated with all articles, prompt drafting of personal learning, reflection and planning.
Save your reflective note into your device or cloud
Fillable PDF frameworks
Adobe reader needed for tablets
Word frameworks - for reflective practice
Click to download
Reflection on a journal article
Stages of reflection on a situation
Reflection of a team, practice or group
External reference on reflection
Reflective practice in health care and how to reflect effectively
Koshy K, Limb C et al. International Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2017 2:e20
The Practitioner 2007;251(1690):18-23
PCA3 improves diagnosis of prostate cancer
01 Jan 2007
A single prostate specific antigen (PSA) measurement is of limited use in differentiating between prostate cancer and BPH, unless it is significantly elevated. When the most frequently used PSA cut-off point of 4.0 ng/ml is employed, a significant number of patients with BPH are identified as false positives for prostate cancer. Men with a PSA of between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/ml have around a 20 per cent chance of having prostate cancer; in those with a PSA of >10.0 ng/ml, the chance of a positive biopsy is 62 per cent. However, the recent Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) demonstrated that 17 per cent of men who were identified with prostate cancer in fact had a PSA value below 4.0 ng/ml, and some patients had a value below 2.5 ng/ml. Annual measurement of PSA may improve accurate diagnosis, but is also controversial. [With external links to the evidence base]
This article can be accessed only if you are a paid-up subscriber to The Practitioner.